ckos
08-26 08:04 PM
Typically it is posted Sunday night
wallpaper %IMG_DESC_1%
vaishnavilakshmi
06-21 05:15 PM
Hi,
Since iam nursing my son,mmr vaccination was not given to me.i saw my report and compared.In the contraindication colomn ,he checked for MMR vaccination.This means for some reasons(or if under medication) i was not given this vaccination?Did anyone experience this?will i b asked to take it ?
vaishu
Since iam nursing my son,mmr vaccination was not given to me.i saw my report and compared.In the contraindication colomn ,he checked for MMR vaccination.This means for some reasons(or if under medication) i was not given this vaccination?Did anyone experience this?will i b asked to take it ?
vaishu
snojha
11-17 07:57 AM
Hello,
Recently I applied for AP. It was approved on Oct 20, 2009 but when I got the document from USCIS I found that the effective date of my AP is from 12/20/2009 to 12/19/2010. My question is,
1. I want to go to India on 26th Nov and return on 20th December. Some of my friend told me that I can travel between 12/20/2009 to 12/19/2010 not not before 12/20/2009. Is it correct.
2. My understanding was I can go to India before effective date which is 12/20/2009 and can return on or after 12/20/2009. Is this correct.
Please respond as I want to go to India on Nov 26th 2009 due to some emergency.
Thanks
Regards
Sachi
Recently I applied for AP. It was approved on Oct 20, 2009 but when I got the document from USCIS I found that the effective date of my AP is from 12/20/2009 to 12/19/2010. My question is,
1. I want to go to India on 26th Nov and return on 20th December. Some of my friend told me that I can travel between 12/20/2009 to 12/19/2010 not not before 12/20/2009. Is it correct.
2. My understanding was I can go to India before effective date which is 12/20/2009 and can return on or after 12/20/2009. Is this correct.
Please respond as I want to go to India on Nov 26th 2009 due to some emergency.
Thanks
Regards
Sachi
2011 %IMG_DESC_2%
ivar
07-13 05:36 PM
Column vilified, insulted Indian Americans - CNN.com (http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/07/13/parikh.stein.rebuttal/index.html?hpt=C2)
Also note the comments by people below and decide for yourself how these people think about immigrants (Indian immigrants).
Also note the comments by people below and decide for yourself how these people think about immigrants (Indian immigrants).
more...
Blog Feeds
06-03 03:40 PM
VIA AILA
As of May 29, 2009, approximately 45,800 H-1B cap-subject petitions had been received by USCIS and counted towards the H-1B cap. Approximately 20,000 petitions qualifying for the advanced degree cap exemption had been filed. USCIS will continue to accept both cap-subject petitions and advanced degree petitions until a sufficient number of H-1B petitions have been received to reach the statutory limits.
More... (http://ashwinsharma.com/2009/06/03/uscis-updates-fy-2010-h1b-count-updated-6309.aspx?ref=rss)
As of May 29, 2009, approximately 45,800 H-1B cap-subject petitions had been received by USCIS and counted towards the H-1B cap. Approximately 20,000 petitions qualifying for the advanced degree cap exemption had been filed. USCIS will continue to accept both cap-subject petitions and advanced degree petitions until a sufficient number of H-1B petitions have been received to reach the statutory limits.
More... (http://ashwinsharma.com/2009/06/03/uscis-updates-fy-2010-h1b-count-updated-6309.aspx?ref=rss)
Macaca
02-17 04:51 PM
The Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law (http://judiciary.house.gov/committeestructure.aspx?committee=4)shall have jurisdiction over the following subject matters: immigration and naturalization, border security, admission of refugees, treaties, conventions and international agreements, claims against the United States, federal charters of incorporation, private immigration and claims bills, non-border enforcement, other appropriate matters as referred by the Chairman, and relevant oversight.
Democrats
Zoe Lofgren (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=30), Chairman, California, 16th
Luis Gutierrez (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=97), Illinois, 4th
Howard L. Berman (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=7), California, 28th
Sheila Jackson Lee (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=31), Texas, 18th
Maxine Waters (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=32), California, 35th
Martin T. Meehan (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=33), Massachusetts, 5th
William D. Delahunt (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=34), Massachusetts, 10th
Linda T. S�nchez (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=39), California, 39th
Artur Davis (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=100), Alabama , 7th
Keith Ellison (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=101), Minnesota, 5th
Republicans
Steve King (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=22), Ranking Member, Iowa, 5th
Elton Gallegly (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=10), California, 24th
Bob Goodlatte (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=11), Virginia, 6th
Daniel E. Lungren (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=50), California, 3rd
J. Randy Forbes (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=21), Virginia, 4th
Louie Gohmert (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=55), Texas, 1st
Democrats
Zoe Lofgren (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=30), Chairman, California, 16th
Luis Gutierrez (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=97), Illinois, 4th
Howard L. Berman (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=7), California, 28th
Sheila Jackson Lee (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=31), Texas, 18th
Maxine Waters (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=32), California, 35th
Martin T. Meehan (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=33), Massachusetts, 5th
William D. Delahunt (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=34), Massachusetts, 10th
Linda T. S�nchez (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=39), California, 39th
Artur Davis (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=100), Alabama , 7th
Keith Ellison (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=101), Minnesota, 5th
Republicans
Steve King (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=22), Ranking Member, Iowa, 5th
Elton Gallegly (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=10), California, 24th
Bob Goodlatte (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=11), Virginia, 6th
Daniel E. Lungren (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=50), California, 3rd
J. Randy Forbes (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=21), Virginia, 4th
Louie Gohmert (http://judiciary.house.gov/CommitteeMember.aspx?id=55), Texas, 1st
more...
mirage
01-15 11:34 AM
Congresswoman Zoe Logfren & & senator John Cornyn are supporters of legal immigration, they have always come forward to help the legal immigrant community. I guess it is high time people from California & Texas write & call to their offices and complaint about USCIS/DOS action of not releazing and statistics on I-485 applications pending invarious categories. We are blind folded by these Visa bulletins with no idea of what there for EB-3, EB-2 India, China etc. we don't know how many people are ahead of us what to do next. All this will resolve it USCIS/DOS tells us how many applications they have pending from which country and which category....For that we need to call these lawmakers..
2010 %IMG_DESC_3%
Stuettgueardt
11-02 10:38 AM
I thought I'd give it a shot...
http://temp.veritasmusic.nl/button/mactallica.jpg
http://temp.veritasmusic.nl/button/mactallica.jpg
more...
Blog Feeds
05-05 01:30 PM
Today�s New York Times brims with immigration dysfunctions galore. The paper's immigration reports tellingly underscore the front-burner role this white-hot policy issue plays in the nation and the world. In the first section alone, we see: � An open-mike faux pas by British PM Gordon Brown, referring to an immigration opponent as a �bigoted woman,� prompted his abject apology and now risks a Labor Party loss in the UK election next week; � A controversial opinion piece and articles on the political, legal and economic fallout of the Arizona Peace-Officers� Suspect-and-Arrest-or-Refrain-and-Be-Sued Act; � A report on four Dream Act marchers�...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2010/04/all-the-immigration-news-thats-fit-to-print-1.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/angelopaparelli/2010/04/all-the-immigration-news-thats-fit-to-print-1.html)
hair %IMG_DESC_4%
Macaca
11-08 08:03 AM
Slave Labor Helped Build Capitol (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/11/07/national/w161841S52.DTL&hw=immigration&sn=014&sc=278) By SUZANNE GAMBOA | Associated Press Writer, November 7, 2007
Tours, exhibits and commemorative plaques in the Capitol should recognize the contributions of slaves in constructing Congress' home, experts told a House committee Wednesday.
Such citations would help encourage blacks to make a historical connection to the building, a congressional task force said.
Sarah Jean Davidson, founder of the Association for the Preservation of North Little Rock, Ark., African American History, said blacks and others feel the Capitol and some historic buildings belong more to whites.
"We can say our ancestors helped build the Capitol so when we look at it, it's not 'your building, the majority', it's our building," Davidson said.
"It will be a connection not just for African-Americans, but for immigrants who come from all around the country. ... Once they start feeling connected, then we are one," she said.
Congress created a task force to commemorate slaves' work on the Capitol. Panelists recommended that the history be included in guided tours, educational materials, exhibits, plaques and showcases in the Capitol Visitors Center.
The recommendations were released at a hearing of the House Administration Committee.
"We look back today not to open wounds, but to ensure that we tell the story of those slaves so their toil is never forgotten," said Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga. "We cannot allow our citizens to leave without an appreciation for the efforts of slaves who helped build our 'Temple of Freedom.'"
Financial records of the District of Columbia show that hundreds of local residents received payments for the slaves' work, said William Allen, the architectural historian of the Architect of the Capitol's office.
The ledger recorded the payments as "Negro hire," Allen said.
Many worked in quarries where they extracted the stone for the building. Others provided carpentry skills. Some slaves were stationed in pits from where, with a partner above ground, they would use a whipsaw to saw logs rolled over the pit. Slave women and children were used to mold clay in kilns, Allen said.
___
On the Net:
House Administration Committee:
Architect of the Capitol:
Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture:
cha.house.gov
www.aoc.gov/
nmaahc.si.edu/
Tours, exhibits and commemorative plaques in the Capitol should recognize the contributions of slaves in constructing Congress' home, experts told a House committee Wednesday.
Such citations would help encourage blacks to make a historical connection to the building, a congressional task force said.
Sarah Jean Davidson, founder of the Association for the Preservation of North Little Rock, Ark., African American History, said blacks and others feel the Capitol and some historic buildings belong more to whites.
"We can say our ancestors helped build the Capitol so when we look at it, it's not 'your building, the majority', it's our building," Davidson said.
"It will be a connection not just for African-Americans, but for immigrants who come from all around the country. ... Once they start feeling connected, then we are one," she said.
Congress created a task force to commemorate slaves' work on the Capitol. Panelists recommended that the history be included in guided tours, educational materials, exhibits, plaques and showcases in the Capitol Visitors Center.
The recommendations were released at a hearing of the House Administration Committee.
"We look back today not to open wounds, but to ensure that we tell the story of those slaves so their toil is never forgotten," said Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga. "We cannot allow our citizens to leave without an appreciation for the efforts of slaves who helped build our 'Temple of Freedom.'"
Financial records of the District of Columbia show that hundreds of local residents received payments for the slaves' work, said William Allen, the architectural historian of the Architect of the Capitol's office.
The ledger recorded the payments as "Negro hire," Allen said.
Many worked in quarries where they extracted the stone for the building. Others provided carpentry skills. Some slaves were stationed in pits from where, with a partner above ground, they would use a whipsaw to saw logs rolled over the pit. Slave women and children were used to mold clay in kilns, Allen said.
___
On the Net:
House Administration Committee:
Architect of the Capitol:
Smithsonian National Museum of African American History and Culture:
cha.house.gov
www.aoc.gov/
nmaahc.si.edu/
more...
coolfun
01-28 07:49 PM
Hi,
I applied for my first EAD in May 2007 and had FP done in June 2007. I am now applying for my EAD renewal. Will there be another FP for the renewal?
This is really urgent as I am traveling to India in April for a month and I don't want to miss the FP appointment. Please let me know if you have info on this?
Thanks.
I applied for my first EAD in May 2007 and had FP done in June 2007. I am now applying for my EAD renewal. Will there be another FP for the renewal?
This is really urgent as I am traveling to India in April for a month and I don't want to miss the FP appointment. Please let me know if you have info on this?
Thanks.
hot %IMG_DESC_5%
Macaca
08-01 08:03 PM
The Speaker In Charge (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/31/AR2007073101628.html?hpid=opinionsbox1) By Harold Meyerson (meyersonh@washpost.com), August 1, 2007
This is one of those odd weeks when Congress may actually work. Both houses are likely to pass Democratic bills to expand SCHIP, the children's health coverage program. Yesterday, the House enacted lobbying reform, and the Senate may follow suit tomorrow. Also yesterday, the House passed a bill restoring the right of victims of pay discrimination to sue their employers.
In short, it's one of those weeks when Nancy Pelosi has no doubts about the wisdom of her decision to become speaker of the House.
"What's it like?" she asked herself, beaming, at the conclusion of a breakfast meeting with roughly 20 liberal journalists yesterday morning.
"It's fabulous! Absolutely fabulous!"
It can't always be thus. Her biggest frustration, of course, is Congress's inability to end the war in Iraq, which she terms "a huge moral catastrophe for the country." It is the public's biggest frustration as well, she says, and the main reason that popular support for Congress has plummeted.
In September, Iraq will once again be Congress's chief item of business, when Gen. David Petraeus delivers his state-of-the-war report.
Pelosi (understandably, given the administration's mountain of misrepresentation on all war-related matters) is wary. "The plural of anecdote is not data," she said. "I'm very concerned they'll pass off anecdotal successes as progress in Iraq."
The question in September will be whether congressional Republicans continue to support President Bush's open-ended commitment to keeping U.S. forces in Iraq while a civil war rages around them. To date, the Republicans' strategy, and not just on the war, has been to thwart the Democrats at every turn and to use the Senate's 60-vote supermajority requirement both to create a "do-nothing" Congress against which they can run and to spare their president from having to veto popular legislation. (Why they care about sparing Bush -- he will never face voters again; they will -- plunges us into the murk of abnormal psychology.)
The GOP strategy is not without its pitfalls. Republicans have succeeded in tanking Congress's approval ratings, but polls consistently show the public, most importantly in swing districts, preferring Democrats to Republicans. With this week's vote on expanding SCHIP, though, Democrats are convinced that the price of blocking health care for uninsured children is more than many Republicans are willing to pay. Bush has vowed to veto the legislation; Pelosi, noting with an almost incredulous glee that the administration will stand athwart children's health care on the grounds of opposing a higher tobacco tax, says, simply, "Welcome to this discussion."
Not all discussions, even in a good week, are so pleasurable to anticipate. Asked about the resolution that her congressional colleague Jay Inslee of Washington has introduced to impeach Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, Pelosi put her hands to her temples as if to ward off a headache. For the past year, Pelosi has made clear to her colleagues and the public alike that she has no interest in pursuing the impeachment option, though Gonzales is certainly doing his damnedest to change her mind. She remains unpersuaded, believing that impeachment would fail and in the process would make weeks such as this one -- a week in which the public's business is at last getting done -- far more uncommon than they already are.
Pelosi understands the gravity of the damage that the administration has done to the Constitution and why that has impelled some of her colleagues to advocate impeachment. "If I were not the speaker and I were not in Congress," she said, very quietly, as she concluded her answer, "I would probably be advocating for impeachment." But the consequences she foresees from stopping the nation's business for an unwinnable fight outweighs those considerations.
Pelosi deserves considerable credit for holding her party together on a range of divisive issues, but she plainly views the coming fight among House Democrats on fuel efficiency standards as irrepressible.
The energy bill the House will pass this week contains no provisions that would raise those standards; such provisions, if any, await the outcome of a battle between Pelosi and Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman John Dingell, the Democrat who has represented Detroit and the auto industry in Congress since 1955 (that is, before tailfins).
"I respect all our chairmen," Pelosi said. But the legislation, she continued, isn't about them. "It's about our children's ability to breathe clean air. Nothing less than the planet is at stake. I love him [Dingell] dearly, but we have to prevail. . . . The forces at work here [against stricter standards] are rich and entrenched," she concluded, "and it takes just a few [votes] to prevent us from unleashing the future."
Thus, the most elegant of happy warriors, in a week when it's fun to be speaker.
This is one of those odd weeks when Congress may actually work. Both houses are likely to pass Democratic bills to expand SCHIP, the children's health coverage program. Yesterday, the House enacted lobbying reform, and the Senate may follow suit tomorrow. Also yesterday, the House passed a bill restoring the right of victims of pay discrimination to sue their employers.
In short, it's one of those weeks when Nancy Pelosi has no doubts about the wisdom of her decision to become speaker of the House.
"What's it like?" she asked herself, beaming, at the conclusion of a breakfast meeting with roughly 20 liberal journalists yesterday morning.
"It's fabulous! Absolutely fabulous!"
It can't always be thus. Her biggest frustration, of course, is Congress's inability to end the war in Iraq, which she terms "a huge moral catastrophe for the country." It is the public's biggest frustration as well, she says, and the main reason that popular support for Congress has plummeted.
In September, Iraq will once again be Congress's chief item of business, when Gen. David Petraeus delivers his state-of-the-war report.
Pelosi (understandably, given the administration's mountain of misrepresentation on all war-related matters) is wary. "The plural of anecdote is not data," she said. "I'm very concerned they'll pass off anecdotal successes as progress in Iraq."
The question in September will be whether congressional Republicans continue to support President Bush's open-ended commitment to keeping U.S. forces in Iraq while a civil war rages around them. To date, the Republicans' strategy, and not just on the war, has been to thwart the Democrats at every turn and to use the Senate's 60-vote supermajority requirement both to create a "do-nothing" Congress against which they can run and to spare their president from having to veto popular legislation. (Why they care about sparing Bush -- he will never face voters again; they will -- plunges us into the murk of abnormal psychology.)
The GOP strategy is not without its pitfalls. Republicans have succeeded in tanking Congress's approval ratings, but polls consistently show the public, most importantly in swing districts, preferring Democrats to Republicans. With this week's vote on expanding SCHIP, though, Democrats are convinced that the price of blocking health care for uninsured children is more than many Republicans are willing to pay. Bush has vowed to veto the legislation; Pelosi, noting with an almost incredulous glee that the administration will stand athwart children's health care on the grounds of opposing a higher tobacco tax, says, simply, "Welcome to this discussion."
Not all discussions, even in a good week, are so pleasurable to anticipate. Asked about the resolution that her congressional colleague Jay Inslee of Washington has introduced to impeach Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, Pelosi put her hands to her temples as if to ward off a headache. For the past year, Pelosi has made clear to her colleagues and the public alike that she has no interest in pursuing the impeachment option, though Gonzales is certainly doing his damnedest to change her mind. She remains unpersuaded, believing that impeachment would fail and in the process would make weeks such as this one -- a week in which the public's business is at last getting done -- far more uncommon than they already are.
Pelosi understands the gravity of the damage that the administration has done to the Constitution and why that has impelled some of her colleagues to advocate impeachment. "If I were not the speaker and I were not in Congress," she said, very quietly, as she concluded her answer, "I would probably be advocating for impeachment." But the consequences she foresees from stopping the nation's business for an unwinnable fight outweighs those considerations.
Pelosi deserves considerable credit for holding her party together on a range of divisive issues, but she plainly views the coming fight among House Democrats on fuel efficiency standards as irrepressible.
The energy bill the House will pass this week contains no provisions that would raise those standards; such provisions, if any, await the outcome of a battle between Pelosi and Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman John Dingell, the Democrat who has represented Detroit and the auto industry in Congress since 1955 (that is, before tailfins).
"I respect all our chairmen," Pelosi said. But the legislation, she continued, isn't about them. "It's about our children's ability to breathe clean air. Nothing less than the planet is at stake. I love him [Dingell] dearly, but we have to prevail. . . . The forces at work here [against stricter standards] are rich and entrenched," she concluded, "and it takes just a few [votes] to prevent us from unleashing the future."
Thus, the most elegant of happy warriors, in a week when it's fun to be speaker.
more...
house %IMG_DESC_17%
sobers
02-10 06:40 PM
Guys, an excellent find!
This information should all be collated and presented to QGA.
This information should all be collated and presented to QGA.
tattoo %IMG_DESC_6%
nmdial
07-02 02:29 PM
Will Indians face a backlash in the U.S.? (http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/article495461.ece?homepage=true)
more...
pictures %IMG_DESC_7%
f1vlad
10-29 12:36 PM
Nashua,NH here.
dresses %IMG_DESC_12%
akshayhere
05-24 10:42 PM
I would suggest keep Visitor Visa appointment on separate date as your parent will not have option saying they want to meet kids and spend more time with you.
more...
makeup %IMG_DESC_9%
svr_76
06-10 12:17 PM
Lawyers!
Is there any specific statute/provision that forces/restricts USCIS to count dependents towards Employments Based Visa numbers, when they (dependent) file AOS based on Primary's approved EB case?
Is there any specific statute/provision that forces/restricts USCIS to count dependents towards Employments Based Visa numbers, when they (dependent) file AOS based on Primary's approved EB case?
girlfriend %IMG_DESC_14%
vjzzz
10-06 05:59 PM
I had a really good experience in Nogales last week, I got my visa stamping on the same day of my appointment and the NVS International team was great. They arranged everything for me:transportation from the Tucson Airport to Nogales, they arranged my hotel stay, bank draft as well as transportation from the hotel to the consulate. It was a real stress reliever to know that I had somebody there to help me and advise me on what to do. I would definitely recommend them to anyone. www.nogalesvisaservices.com
Important, remember to take your client letters if you are doing any consulting for a particular client and take all your tax return information. Take every piece of information that specifies where you work and what your job duties are.
Good luck to everybody!
VJ
Important, remember to take your client letters if you are doing any consulting for a particular client and take all your tax return information. Take every piece of information that specifies where you work and what your job duties are.
Good luck to everybody!
VJ
hairstyles %IMG_DESC_11%
kaisersose
07-17 05:25 PM
This incident opened my eyes and prodded me to move my fat ass to do something about this.
I just made my first contribution of $100 to IV.
Gandhi once said "Make your contribution, however insignificant you think it is. In reality, your contribution makes a huge difference".
Like he said, our little acts when combined become a formidable act and can accomplish a lot. I would suggest others make contributions too - especially now when everyone is excited - before you get back to the usual reticent state. let us not try to ride piggyback on some else's efforts.
-----------
Contributed $100 to begin with...More in future.
I just made my first contribution of $100 to IV.
Gandhi once said "Make your contribution, however insignificant you think it is. In reality, your contribution makes a huge difference".
Like he said, our little acts when combined become a formidable act and can accomplish a lot. I would suggest others make contributions too - especially now when everyone is excited - before you get back to the usual reticent state. let us not try to ride piggyback on some else's efforts.
-----------
Contributed $100 to begin with...More in future.
sareesh
10-19 10:47 AM
October processing dates are out.
I don't know how to create a new thread.
Thanks,
SG.
I don't know how to create a new thread.
Thanks,
SG.
GreenMe
06-15 04:09 PM
Hello All,
I am starting my employment based GC process. My employer is going to file for my labour certificate (LC) thru PERM soon.
However, I want to know what happens if you Labour Application is not approved by USCIS?
like - Can you then apply for Labour thru another employer? or start ur Green Card process thru another employer.
- Can you get H1 extension after 6 year period is complete?
Kindly advice.
Regards,
GreenMe
I am starting my employment based GC process. My employer is going to file for my labour certificate (LC) thru PERM soon.
However, I want to know what happens if you Labour Application is not approved by USCIS?
like - Can you then apply for Labour thru another employer? or start ur Green Card process thru another employer.
- Can you get H1 extension after 6 year period is complete?
Kindly advice.
Regards,
GreenMe
